Blog Layout

DIGITAL PRIVACY | Carpenter v. United States [Updated 2019]

Lawrence Koplow • Nov 29, 2019

What is Dignital Privacy?

Can the government track your movements, without a warrant, through cell phone data?   For almost four months?   That was the main question the Supreme Court attempted to answer in Carpenter v. United States,   585 U.S. ___ (2018).

A Time-Stamped Record

Many of the ever-growing functions of your cell phone rely on the ability of the device to continuously connect (“ping”) to cell towers.   Every time a phone connects to a cell tower it generates a time-stamped record.   This data is known as cell-site location information (CSLI)

The data is retained by your cell service provider, and if enough is gathered, this information is capable of creating a comprehensive picture of your daily life.

Stored Communications Act

In Carpenter , law enforcement obtained the phone numbers of several robbery suspects.   The government, pursuant to a law called the Stored Communications Act, was granted an order (not a warrant) to seize a suspect’s cell-site location information.

Stored Communications Act
Burden of Proof Probable Cause

Generally, when the government seizes something they need a warrant supported by probable cause.   However, under the Stored Communications Act , Congress lowered the amount of proof (that a crime was committed) needed to seize this data.

The CSLI data linked Carpenter to the robberies and he was later convicted.   Prior to trial, Carpenter moved to suppress the cell site information seized, but his motion was denied. 

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

The Sixth Circuit Holds...

The Sixth Circuit held that Carpenter had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the location of his physical movements because he voluntarily shared the information with his wireless provider (applying something called the third-party doctrine).   They affirmed his conviction.

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS)

The United States Supreme Court decided to hear the case.   Justice Roberts, writing for the majority, held the Government’s seizure of Carpenter’s cell-site records was a Fourth Amendment search.

He stated that the “digital data at issue—personal location information maintained by a third party—does not fit neatly under existing precedents…”   The tracking of a person’s prior movements through CSLI is “detailed, encyclopedic, and effortlessly compiled.”   Prior cell-site records may “ present even greater privacy concerns than the GPS monitoring” previously considered by the court.”

Digital Privacy

Data Was Not Voluntarily Given

The Court found Carpenter hadn’t voluntarily turned over the data at issue as the Sixth Circuit held.   Instead, the Court found historical location information “is not truly ‘shared’” as cell phones are “‘such a pervasive and insistent part of daily life’ that carrying one is indispensable to participation in modern society.”   Moreover, a cell phone logs a cell-site record “without any affirmative act on the user’s part beyond powering up.”

The Court ultimately held a warrant was required to seize this data and reversed.  This ruling is helping answer the queation: what is privacy in a digital world?

Lawrence Koplow Signature

Lawrence Koplow is an Arizona Criminal Defense Attorney.  His practice focuses on DUI and Vehicular Crimes.  Mr. Koplow can be contacted regarding legal issues and representation here: CONTACT.

More on the Fourth Amendment:

Traffic Stop DUI Arizona

Traffic Stops

Traffic stops by police are one of the most frequent and reoccuring actions that invoke Fourth Amendment and privacy issues.

Pretrial Motions Arizona DUI

Pretrial Motions

Fourth Amendment and Privacy issues are challenged through pretrial motions. These motions request a court to find not only a constitutional violation occurred, by also request the remedy of suppression.

Arizona DUI Lawyer Arrest

DUI Arrests

An arrest for an alleged DUI requires more proof than for a traffic stop. However, they also usually raise issues related to the validity of forensic evidence.

By Lawrence Koplow 09 Sep, 2020
The reported results of a BAC test in DUI cases appear to provide the answer we are seeking: how much ethanol is in a person’s blood.  However, let’s look at the fine print. The Reported Results A machine called a gas chromatograph is used to measure an alcohol concentration in blood samples.   The measurement, which […] The post Reported Result vs. Complete Result appeared first on Lawrence Koplow: Arizona DUI Attorney | Phoenix & Scottsdale.
By Lawrence Koplow 05 Sep, 2020
The appearance of science can become the appearance of truth - even when the junk science is employed. Do we provide enough bandwidth to debunk these unreliable scientific claims? The post A Legal Bandwidth Problem appeared first on Lawrence Koplow: Arizona DUI Attorney | Phoenix & Scottsdale.
By Lawrence Koplow 27 Aug, 2020
Measuring is different from counting. However, in forensic science the two are often suggested to be the same. This needs to change. MEASURING Measuring is the assignment of a number, and all the uncertainties of that of that number, to something.  The purpose of assigning a number is to give meaning to the object measured. […] The post Measuring and Counting | Forensic Science appeared first on Lawrence Koplow: Arizona DUI Attorney | Phoenix & Scottsdale.
By Lawrence Koplow 23 Aug, 2020
What Do You Give a Shit About? You probably haven’t really considered the question. Finding the answer is not as easy as it may seem. Looking inward is uncomfortable. Self-examination requires courage. It may also demand change. Once you see what you really give a shit about – you can’t unsee it. Once you define […] The post Give a shit? appeared first on Lawrence Koplow: Arizona DUI Attorney | Phoenix & Scottsdale.
By Lawrence Koplow 10 Aug, 2020
The Vermont Supreme Court holds xx The Constitutional Question xx The Legal Answer(s)  A xx  majority opinion reversed the appellate court decision finding: xx xx XX The Facts Traffic Stop A Vermont state trooper monitoring traffic on an Interstate.  He observed a vehicle traveling northbound without its rear license plate illuminated. The officer stopped the […] The post Validity of Consent To Search | Vermont v. Weisler appeared first on Lawrence Koplow: Arizona DUI Attorney | Phoenix & Scottsdale.
By Lawrence Koplow 05 Aug, 2020
Esketamine Drug DUI Cases Will Become An Issue in Arizona It is well established that Depression is a common and serious health problem. According to the World Health Organization the disease affects more than 264 million people. Common Depression Treatments Depression treatments typically include antidepressant medications that fall in a class of drugs known as […] The post Esketamine DUI: How is it Different than Ketamine? appeared first on Lawrence Koplow: Arizona DUI Attorney | Phoenix & Scottsdale.
By Lawrence Koplow 27 Jul, 2020
Arizona has an incarceration problem. We incarcerate people at a higher rate than most other states and many other countries. Incarcerating such a high rate of people comes with both a social and economic cost. To address these issues, several years ago the Arizona legislature passed a law that authorized a portion of a jail […] The post Home Detention: Approved for Maricopa County in DUI Cases appeared first on Lawrence Koplow: Arizona DUI Attorney | Phoenix & Scottsdale.
By Lawrence Koplow 21 Jul, 2020
In the November 2020 election, a restricted use of recreational marijuana will be on Arizona voter’s ballots. The ballot initiative essentially decriminalizes possession and use of small amounts of cannabis. Currently, possession of marijuana is a felony in Arizona. This initiative would end such prosecutions. Arizona’s Marijuana initiative is titled the Smart and Safe Arizona […] The post 9 Facts About Arizona’s Recreational Marijuana Initiative (2020) appeared first on Lawrence Koplow: Arizona DUI Attorney | Phoenix & Scottsdale.
By Lawrence Koplow 26 Jun, 2020
Justice Gorsuch authored the majority opinion The Legal Question Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on sex.  Does this mean the statute prohibits discrimination based on an individual’s sexual orientation? The Legal Answer Yes.  Employers who fire employees for being gay or transgender violates Title VII of the […] The post Bostock v. Clayton County
Summary appeared first on Lawrence Koplow: Arizona DUI Attorney | Phoenix & Scottsdale.
By Lawrence Koplow 02 May, 2020
Sometimes, what you need, is found in the last place you would ever expect it. When a teenage kid is caught in the middle of trying to steal the tires off the Batmobile you expect something to happen. You expect Batman to dispense his brand of “justice”.   https://youtu.be/7sVDEXfMdXo However, maybe his idea of justice […] The post Strength and Compassion of Batman [Updated 2020] appeared first on Lawrence Koplow: Arizona DUI Attorney | Phoenix & Scottsdale.
More Posts
Share by: